linkspam_mod: A metal chain (Default)
[personal profile] linkspam_mod posting in [community profile] linkspam
[personal profile] zvi: You don't have to go looking for this stuff, it just traipses across your reading page, you guys
So, sadly, the happy fun times gay Regency story has fucked up colonial issues. Which sucks donkeyballs, because what someone opening that story up wanted was 20k of the good slashcrack. But, weirdly enough, if you know a lot about the history of India and Britain and you read the story, the issues smack you in the face and throw you out of the whole thing and it's just sitting there being fucked up.

[personal profile] naraht: History without oppression?
You can interrogate oppression, subvert it, attack it, analyze it, satirize it, wearily accept it, ignorantly accept it, happily accept it, ignore it, brush it aside or try to hide it. All of those are options when you're writing historical fiction. But I don't believe it's possible to create an oppression-free society within a given recognizable historical context. Escapism can only ever go so far.

[ profile] rm: sundries
Anyway, examining the Regency AU, and the oddities of it, and how to reconcile them or not with the historical and later literary source is really interesting stuff, especially in the context of a lot of the issues fandom is grappling with lately. I think it also speaks, tangentally to a lot of the post-CoE discussion about the use of homophobia in the narrative regarding Ianto. As writers, can we show biases without enacting bias? Is it better to remove non-narratively central hate from stories or keep it in for "realism"? What do we do when the audience doesn't get it? How do we as writers do it so the audience does get it? Are these even in the right questions? Etc.

[personal profile] marina: (no subject) [discussion on subverting or avoiding colonialist attitudes in historical works]
Also I have spent most of today seething over various things that have been on my mind lately. Twilight and True Blood and how one is perceived as ~girl fiction~ and the other is not, Sherlock Holmes and how that movie brilliantly, imo, created a certain universe where all the issues of Victorian England were present but elegantly handled and how I'm afraid that fandom will not realize where the bodies are buried and will traipse all over the skeletons.

[personal profile] darkrose: Through a glass, darkly
Removing a character from their historical context by ignoring the problematic aspects of that context is exactly what I wanted to avoid. At the same time, I'm not writing a dissertation on slavery during the Crusades, or about 10th-century Constantinople, or Roman Alexandria, or the history of any of the cultures Jason's been a part of. The arc is fundamentally a romance. The question that this discussion seems to raise is whether or not it's possible to write a historically accurate story with authentic characters that acknowledges the systems of oppression but isn't, in the end, about those systems.

All blockquotes are pullquotes from the original post. Any text in square brackets [ TEXT ] is entered by a linkspam mod.
As requested by readers of the community, linkspam posts of six or more links with blockquotes will be cut for length.
Comments are screened by default, but will be unscreened as long as they are not derailing, abusive or off-topic. If you have thoughts on the content of one of our links, please comment there and not here. Please let us know if you would prefer your comment to remain screened.
You can post further links in the comments to this post or send them to our Delicious account.
Additionally, comments/suggestions/feedback can be left at our feedback post.


linkspam: A chain of links (Default)
Anti-Oppression Linkspam Community

April 2010

456789 10

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags