It's Raining Linkspam
Sep. 2nd, 2009 04:37 pmAnnouncement: The posts at Ogi's journal has been locked. However, the links are included as archive references (and besides, they might've been around long enough to make their way into Google's cache).
Y'know, I'd love to sort out the difference between "meta posts on the subject" and "signal boosting." There's too much. You figure it out. Also, since I compiled these at work, many more of them are in the original journal style, 'cos I had no way to check the journal layout. Just attach ?style=mine or ?format=light to the end of the URL of anything you have trouble reading because of its layout.
As always, please feel free to comment with more nifty links; self-pimping is okay; and let me know if I've got bad code or broken links. Also, I know I've missed crossposted content; I'm happy to include that as well.
ogi_ogas How is straight female interest in slash fiction like straight male interest in transsexuals? Removed from public view, but don't worry; we have screencaps.
vanseedee When Fandom Explodes or Science for Beginners
vanseedee Another Lessen in Science
jonquil Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... Dr. Ogi Ogas (screencaps)
jonquil While I'm screencapping (Ogi Ogas part 2)
rm you have not yet begun to see wrath
jonquil Boosting signal: the BU IRB speaks.
rexluscus Well, that took about two seconds to crash and burn
slashpine BrainFail, let me count the ways
slashpine Re the SurveyFail & clearing one's survey answers
noracharles Another fandom survey, because I was curious, dammit!
aquaeri Because I have the icon
stopthatgirl Oh, it gets even better
stopthatgirl For SCIENCE!
deadlychameleon Bad research and fandom: Surveyfail
alchemia re: the recent BrainFail.... I don't really know if this is funny or totally tasteless.... (NSFW macro. NSFW like an NSFW thing; tentacles are involved. Other warnings may apply; could be triggery; may result in drinks meeting monitors.)
alchemia re: the recent BrainFail.... I don't really know if this is funny or totally tasteless.... (Same post; different site; different comments. NSFW.)
fridgepunk Neurochemistry compels me! (Ogi/Sai RPS)
eumelia Fandom Backlash is Not Pretty [Survey!Fail Edition]
neededalj Why Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam Are Phrenologists
lassarina Boosting signal [fandom related] (Repeat post; different site; different comments)
lanning And we have a deletion!
lanning Game on.
the_shoshanna official response from Boston University on Ogi Ogas and SurveyFail!
glass_icarus (EVEN MORE) FLAMES. ON THE SIDE OF MY FACE.
abka the "survey" or while fangirls rock at distinguishing science from "science"
cjandre How disappointing…
tencrush Ogi ogi ogi…
rm I have a question
drasecretcampus How Not to Do Reasearch
jadey your research is kind of the equivalent of being an ass
seftimiu Just passing information around (signal boost I think it is called?)
vociferocity Untitled okay, so I think my favourite part about surveyfail
villeinage Next step for SurveyFail: Who has publishing connections?
were_duck Lena Headey joins the cast of Game of Thrones!
mockingbirdq I can't stop reading the links!
shadowvalkyrie General update
laura47 SurveyFail! BU "researchers" pissing off everyone ever, getting reported to IRB.
originalpuck Fandom Love, AutumnWrite, and Playing Catch-Up
ariastar comment party: because fic is the way I like to talk about stuff
seperis i miss ship wars like so much
gryphonsegg Real science is open to critique
Skud at Geek Feminism Blog: Who wants to play Evolutionary Neuro Cognitive Research FAIL ...
thelemic I'm with fleurdeliser here. FLAMES ON TH
ljgeoff my fandom hits like a killer asteroid
pandarus Question 42: What Netporn Tells Us About The Brainless
homasse For SCIENCE!
homasse The fail, it is strong
cho_malfoy What.
lainy122 Untitled lainy122
sailorvfan10 that doesn't always wanna make you cry
dglenn EvPsych bonus QotD
mintwitch Signal Boost: Surveyfail just keeps failing.
pantryslut You know, I wasn't going to comment on SurveyFail
lotesseflower wrt SurveyFail
Y'know, I'd love to sort out the difference between "meta posts on the subject" and "signal boosting." There's too much. You figure it out. Also, since I compiled these at work, many more of them are in the original journal style, 'cos I had no way to check the journal layout. Just attach ?style=mine or ?format=light to the end of the URL of anything you have trouble reading because of its layout.
As always, please feel free to comment with more nifty links; self-pimping is okay; and let me know if I've got bad code or broken links. Also, I know I've missed crossposted content; I'm happy to include that as well.
Skud at Geek Feminism Blog: Who wants to play Evolutionary Neuro Cognitive Research FAIL ...
(no subject)
Thank you again for doing all this. I know there is a high risk of burn-out among archivers, so really, really, really thank you.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I can collect links during the day (through searches & email replies), and format them for posting, but I can't go look at them.
I'd rather sort them--a section for meta, a section for signalboost, a section for macros & other funnies--but don't have time, and figure that people would rather have 60 links unsorted than 12 links selected carefully to be "most interesting." (For "most interesting," watch metafandom.)
(no subject)
http://jonquil.dreamwidth.org/867288.ht
http://jonquil.livejournal.com/892111.h
Title, "Highway to the meta zone"
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(also, my post is mirrored on DW here, not that there's been much discussion there in comparison.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
http://www.roughtheory.org/content/wear
WEARING THE JUICE: A CASE STUDY IN RESEARCH IMPLOSION
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I knew I was catching the non-commented crossposts at times, and signal boosts that were just copies, and decided that spending an extra couple of hours sorting them was a Sisyphean effort; by the time I got done, there'd be more than I could keep up with.
(no subject)
And this; "cannot promise I have even enough brain cells left for Dr. Ogas to interpret" -- was delightfully snarktasic. Thanks for the chuckle.
(no subject)
(no subject)
There are people working on contacting their agent & publisher. And dedicated to making sure their names are remembered... these two are fresh new PhDs with no actual jobs, and employment in the scientific realms is strongly affected by reputation. A rep for "skeevy, bad-science survey," with notes of "asking minors questions about their sex lives" has a chance of affecting their next few decades worth of income.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Blog post in not!English (Finnish or Swedish?)