Linkspam by the bucketful
Sep. 1st, 2009 10:23 pmSuperthanks to
par_avion for helping with link roundups. If you're feeling swamped by 4 posts in one day, you know who to blame.
Obviously, the only way this will slow down is if I post links to distract everyone to reading & commenting on what's already been posted. Oh, and it would also help if Dr Ogi would stop with the superfail, already. Because if he keeps with his current curve, I can't be held responsible if this is bigger thanStrikethrough.
It'd take some MASSIVE fail to do that... but dayam, he does seem to have those skillz.
Evolutionary Psychology BINGO Card
parthenia14 on social taboos and bad questions
heleninwales Bad science alert!
sabrina_il I need to walk away from this trainwreck or I'm never sleeping tonight (essay about modern psychology)
thenyxie That's Entertainment!
ithiliana Warning: Cognitive Neuroscience of Fanfiction Survey not what you think!
rm sundries: WTC weather, the dying season, and fandom fuckups
perdiccas I'm so frigging sick of people (locked or removed)
keeva what. the. fucking. fuck.
ellen_fremedon Yes, I know I should have known better.
carmarthen A note to researchers on fandom
carmarthen A note to researchers on fandom (Same post; different site; different comments)
glass_icarus fandom: NOT a spectator sport!
imnotandrei Cranky about Evolutionary Psychology -- a personal story
lanning Rule 34
lassarina Boosting Signal [fandom related]
woldy Kink, Bikes & Science Fail
damkianna A survey and other babble.
Two posts in Spanish:
logovo1 LOL NO
logovo1 Más sobre la "encuesta" de
ogi_ogas
starlady Hoist the colors
mecurtin Your daily dose of WTF
mecurtin Your daily dose of WTF (Same post; different journal; different comments)
almostnever survey about fanfic AVOID AVOID (Repeat post; different journal; different comments)
sparkymonster In Which Knowledge is Dropped Like Bombs
scrollgirl What Dr Gaddam thinks of research subjects
scrollgirl What Dr Gaddam thinks of research subjects (Same post; different journal; different comments)
scrollgirl Wow. The stupid, it burns.
scrollgirl Wow. The stupid, it burns. (Same post; different journal; different comments)
medie For the record…
medie This one calls for Jessica...
0mindthegap0 about that 'neuroscience' survey
bossymarmalade now that's market research you can take to the bank -- the *money* bank
bossymarmalade i'm literally angry with rage!
ithiliana BrainFail continues to spread like, well, the Brain that Ate New Jersey!
ithiliana $$$$$
almostnever *prolonged scream*
nestra The latest from Ogi Ogas:
the_shoshanna signal-boosting the moron alert
jonquil Aide-memoire
jonquil Aide-memoire (Same post; different journal; different comments)
lamardeuse Pass it on.
janedavitt Hahaha. Not
othercat Stupid Survey is Stupid
lizbee For once, fandom doesn't make me facepalm
Obviously, the only way this will slow down is if I post links to distract everyone to reading & commenting on what's already been posted. Oh, and it would also help if Dr Ogi would stop with the superfail, already. Because if he keeps with his current curve, I can't be held responsible if this is bigger than
It'd take some MASSIVE fail to do that... but dayam, he does seem to have those skillz.
Evolutionary Psychology BINGO Card
Two posts in Spanish:
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 05:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 05:57 am (UTC)However, I won't even do that for anonymous requests... because I have no idea which of the thirty-odd posts was yours, and am not clicking on them all again to find out.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:34 am (UTC)I'm glad someone's reading them all; I just skim them and sort out if they're appropriate to the topic, and then code them.
And there's a long, LOOOONG list I haven't included, of people who make short posts that basically say "that survey? Eww."
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 07:43 am (UTC)I imagine the list is almost as long as there are fans that find out about it! I did my own, redirecting people here, just in case someone in my small circle hadn't found out about it yet--one has to share the awfulness, you know. I'm glad you're compilation the posts with meat* in them. :)
*I wanted to write manmeant, for some strange reason. I think it's time I went to bed. To sleep. I hope someone is screencaping for posterity, I've a feeling their posts will be gone in the mornings, like a bad dream.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 12:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 02:15 pm (UTC)I'd leave it out unless I were somehow convinced that post was absolutely crucial to the overall conversation. (If Elizabeth Bear's "I was only kidding when I said you had some points" post had said "do not link," we'd've linked it.) I'd put a note up that says "please don't reply there" or something like that, if it were made obvious that the person doesn't want a wankstorm in their journal.
We're still trying to sort out the ethics of not-pestering-people vs offering a full roundup of what's going on. Generally, any single post is not important enough to violate people's wish for the semi-privacy that we normally expect.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 02:56 pm (UTC)I have almost 40 of those. I keep track of them as I collect, so I don't keep clicking on the same posts and then realizing I've already decided not to include them.
I've included a few "signal boost" posts that wound up getting lots of comments beyond the expected "WTF?" You've reminded me that it's probably not a good idea to post a list of signalboost posts; I'd been thinking about it.
On the one hand, I want to say, "thank you for all these posts that get the message out to people who haven't heard it." On the other, I don't want to swamp people with unwanted attention, or remind their creepy ex that they're still posting, or anything like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:07 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:16 am (UTC)Part of link-gathering means I don't get much time to actually read posts, much less comment on them--I did like yours, and am glad you're not upset to have it shared around.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 09:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 04:09 pm (UTC)God knows why they thought that particular sentence would make the perfect header to that particular post.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 08:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 09:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 09:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 06:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 07:07 pm (UTC)The arc of wank is long, and bends towards flouncing
Date: 2009-09-02 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 09:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-09-02 10:20 pm (UTC)http://vanseedee.livejournal.com/27796.h
http://vanseedee.livejournal.com/27563.h
annietext@lj