linkspam: Cry Havoc, and Let Slip the Linkspam

elf (

elf) wrote in

linkspam,
@ 2009-09-29 05:58 pm UTC

Entry tags:

glbtq, llf awards

Cry Havoc, and Let Slip the Linkspam

sparkindarkness Lambda Awards – disagree if you must, but put the privilege and homophobia away

eumelia My own fuzzy opinion about Lambda Literary Awards

gehayi DVD Commentary: Lambda Literary Awards

shemale So Lambda has stated that they will take into consideration…

dubious_virtue A lynching in the making (Same post as one from previous roundup; different site.)

dubious_virtue More re: Lambda Lit versus the Breeders
Selah March: More re: Lambda Lit versus the Breeders (Same post; different sites; different comments)

lanning well, now, here's a to-do

strangetwn_god Lambda Literary Wank

karjack Mini-rants

babel A few things.

Towleroad: Lambda Literary Foundation Announces New Rules, Leadership

TeddyPig: Because Someone Asked

Seeking Avalon: On Isms & Idiots (Part 2)

Seeking Avalon: On Isms & Idiots (Part 3)

emmyjag Lambda Literary Awards: Breeders need not apply

senior_witch Got into internet wank

(Read 13 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Threaded) (Flat)

no subject

elf
2009-09-30 03:22 am UTC (link)

How... quaint.

Are there posts on the pro-LLF side I've missed?
Should I stop collecting links, and delete the LLF awards posts altogether?

Should I hand the project off to someone else? Got any volunteers in mind? As I recall, you had your chance, and bowed out because you thought people would assume you couldn't be unbiased.

I'm willing to drop out. That leaves...

naraht, who is too busy.
I'll happily tell people how & where I get links, and how I format them, and will edit the Masterpost to keep up with things. If there's enough outcry (i.e. a single request from

naraht, or someone whose opinion I personally trust, or an unspecified but not-too-large number of random other people--definitely less than 20, maybe less than 6, depending on whom), I'll drop out of the comm altogether.

I enjoy collecting the links--but I can collect linkspam in my own journal; they're posted here to allow people who don't want to deal with me personally to have easy access.

Should there be a rule that the linkspam collector(s) agree with whatever fandom consensus decrees the privilege-fighting side of a debate, or step down?

Don't like how I collect links? I'm willing to hand it over to... anyone, really. You want it?

(Reply to this) (Thread from start) (Parent) (Thread) (Show 8 comments) (Hide 8 comments) (Show 8 comments)