That said--I'm trying very hard to be impartial in linkspam collection. (Which is fairly easy, actually; once the metastorm gets going, I barely have time to gather links, and no time to read & think about them.)
If there are some that are particularly and directly offensive (I mean, as in name-calling, rather than by abstract concept), I'm happy to tag them with warnings to brace before clicking. (I'm happy to tag the abstract-insulting ones too, but identifying those is much harder.)
Re: whose side?
Date: 2009-09-30 01:46 am (UTC)If there are some that are particularly and directly offensive (I mean, as in name-calling, rather than by abstract concept), I'm happy to tag them with warnings to brace before clicking. (I'm happy to tag the abstract-insulting ones too, but identifying those is much harder.)